Codes |

Standard 189.1 Now Includes TM-30 Requirements

August 19, 2020 in Codes, Color, Documentation, LEDs, Luminaires, Sustainability

Yesterday an addendum to ANSI/ASHRAE/ICC/USGBC/IES Standard 189.1-2017 Standard for the Design of High-Performance Green Buildings was published. The addendum makes changes to Section 8.3.5, which covers lighting. One of the biggest changes is to add TM-30 color rendition criteria to the section on Indoor Lighting Quality. Here’s the relevant text:

8.3.5.3 Color Rendition. At least 95% of lighting power of nominally white lighting within each enclosed space shall be provided by luminaires that meet the following criteria at full light output in accordance with IES-TM-30, Annex E, P2 and F3:
1. R_f of at least 85
2. R_f,h1 of at least 85
3. R_g of at least 92
4. R_cs,h1 of at least -7% but no greater than +19%
Nominally white lighting is lighting that has chromaticity within the basic or extended nominal color correlated temperature (CCT) specifications of ANSI C78.377.
Where a lighting system is capable of changing its spectrum, it shall be capable of meeting the color rendition requirements within each nominal CCT of 2700 K, 3500 K, 4000 K, and 5000 K, as defined in ANSI C78.377, that the system is capable of delivering.

I hope that this is going to put more pressure on manufacturers to improve the color rendering of their luminaires as measured by TM-30, not CRI, and to provide TM-30 information on their cut sheets. If not, they’ll risk not being considered on projects that have TM-30 requirements.

Tags: color rendering, LED color, TM-30
Comments Off on Standard 189.1 Now Includes TM-30 Requirements

White House to Relax Energy Efficiency Rules for Light Bulbs – The New York Times

September 10, 2019 in Codes, Lamps, LEDs, Sustainability

In 2007 Congress passed the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) with the goal of increasing energy efficiency across the economy. Part of EISA has affected the lighting industry in the form of mandated efficacy of light sources. The initial efficacy rules targeted A-Lamps (standard household light bulbs) and set the efficacy level above that of incandescent but below that of halogen lamps. The result was a slow shift to the more energy efficient technology. Over the years the energy efficiency requirements have been expanded to more lamp shapes, always in keeping with technological ability so that we never faced a lamp shortage or loss of a lamp shape. Today, more than 50% of lamps sold are LED that exceed even the most stringent requirements.

On September 4th the administration announced that it was going to cancel a new set of requirements that would have taken effect in January 2020 that would have applied to products such as decorative medium base lamps and MR type lamps. In my opinion, this is another example of the administration cutting off its nose to spite its face. As with the threat to “investigate” automakers who agree with the State of California’s proposed energy efficiency requirements, this effort to undo energy efficiency despite the monumental consensus that we need to reign in our energy consumption isn’t going to go have any effect. No lamp manufacturer is going to reopen or build new factories to make incandescent lamps when it’s obvious that A) the next administration is going to reinstate the efficacy requirements B) the public has embraced the energy savings of LED lamps, and C) the companies know that it would be bad for their image to turn their backs on mitigating climate change.

Source: White House to Relax Energy Efficiency Rules for Light Bulbs – The New York Times

Comments Off on White House to Relax Energy Efficiency Rules for Light Bulbs – The New York Times

Nuclear fusion on brink of being realised, say MIT scientists | Environment | The Guardian

March 9, 2018 in Codes

Imagine, not more energy conservation codes!

Source: Nuclear fusion on brink of being realised, say MIT scientists | Environment | The Guardian

Tags: climate change, new technology
Comments Off on Nuclear fusion on brink of being realised, say MIT scientists | Environment | The Guardian

San Francisco adopts law requiring solar panels on all new buildings

April 21, 2016 in Codes, Sustainability

San Francisco has this week passed landmark legislation requiring all new buildings under 10 storeys in height to be fitted with rooftop solar panels.

The city’s San Francisco Board of Supervisors unanimously passed the new rule on Tuesday, making the metropolis the largest in the US to mandate solar installations on new properties

Source: San Francisco adopts law requiring solar panels on all new buildings

Tags: climate change, renewable energy, solar energy
Comments Off on San Francisco adopts law requiring solar panels on all new buildings

DOE Issues Final Determination Of Energy Conservation Standards for HID Lamps

December 3, 2015 in Codes, Lamps

On December 2nd the U.S. Department of Energy indued a final determination concerning energy conservation standards for high intensity discharge lamps. You can download a PDF of the document from the DOE’s web site.

Tags: energy efficiency, Federal Government
Comments Off on DOE Issues Final Determination Of Energy Conservation Standards for HID Lamps

LPDs, As Low As We Should Go

October 3, 2015 in Codes

ASHRAE has released a series of changes to Standard 90.1 in preparation for the 2016 update. Among those changes is the further tightening of LPDs (click here) in all space and building types. In my opinion, these changes should be rejected by the lighting community.

Rather than provide tight, but reasonable, limitations on the power consumption of lighting systems, the LPDs proposed in the revision of Table 9.5.1 are so low that they clearly favor LED technology almost to the exclusion of all others. They also strongly imply that energy efficiency is the most important criteria of a lighting system, regardless of the application. Neither of these positions is appropriate for this document or the organizations that develop and maintain it.

The proposed LPDs are nearly impossible to meet by lighting designers who wish to exercise their best judgement, or meet client requirements, by selecting project appropriate sources of light other than LED. In some cases this imposes an avoidable financial burden on the owner. For example, LED luminaires with a combination of high output and smooth dimming to zero (such as those required for theatres, cinemas, houses of worship, etc.) are substantially more expensive than halogen alternatives, and may require more expensive control systems as well. Clients requiring excellent color rendering (such as high end retail, art schools, museums, and health care facilities) are also compelled to purchase premium priced LED fixtures.

The only way that these low LPDs (and the even lower LPDs we assume will be proposed in the future) make sense is if they are paired with hours of usage to arrive at a time weighted limitations. Even then, the LPDs should be high enough to permit designers and owners a choice in the technology that they use for a given application. The proposed LPDs come very close to eliminating that choice.

I’m not saying that all buildings should be illuminated with incandescent light, or that LPDs should be abolished. I am saying, however, that the ever tightening of LPDs cannot go on forever, and that we have reached a tipping point where these limitations are having unjustifiable impacts on designs and budgets. In my opinion, LPDs should not be further reduced for the foreseeable future.

Tags: ASHRAE 90.1, energy efficiency
Comments Off on LPDs, As Low As We Should Go

Standard 189.1 Addendum Are Open For Public Review

July 30, 2015 in Codes, Controls

ASHRAE has announced a 30-day public review and comment period for addendum to ASHRAE/USGBC/IES Standard 189.1-2014, beginning on July 24th. The addendum that concerns lighting designers corrects and clarifies a potentially confusing requirement in which a designer may conclude that bonus lighting power control factors from Table 9.6.3 Control Factors Used in Calculating Additional Interior LPD of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1 cannot be used.

More information and instructions on commenting are at https://www.ashrae.org/standards-research–technology/public-review-drafts.

Tags: energy efficiency
Comments Off on Standard 189.1 Addendum Are Open For Public Review

DOE Clarifies Energy Conservation Standards for Fluorescent Ballasts

June 1, 2015 in Codes

On May 29th the DOE issued a final clarification of energy conservation standards and test procedures for fluorescent lamp ballasts. The new rule reorganizes, reformats, and clarifies the scope of the energy conservation standards for fluorescent lamp ballasts. It includes establishing new active mode test procedures, standby and off mode test procedures, and revised active mode test procedures for fluorescent ballasts.

Tags: energy efficiency, Federal Government, Fluorescent ballasts
Comments Off on DOE Clarifies Energy Conservation Standards for Fluorescent Ballasts

New York Plan to Save Energy May Mean a Dimmer Skyline

April 30, 2015 in Codes, Design, Sustainability

Mayor Bill de Blasio’s administration and a host of environmental advocates agree that light pollution should be addressed, but some are disputing parts of a proposed City Council bill.

Source: New York Plan to Save Energy May Mean a Dimmer Skyline

Tags: climate change, energy efficiency
Comments Off on New York Plan to Save Energy May Mean a Dimmer Skyline

DOE Extends Comment Period for General Service Lamps Standards

January 28, 2015 in Codes, Lamps

The Department of Energy (DOE) has extended the comment period for proposed energy efficiency standards for general service lamps (GSLs) until February 23, 2015. Documents associated with this set of standards are Docket No. EERE-2013-BT-STD-0051. There is a link on that page to submit comments.

You may recall that the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) set minimum efficiency standards for medium screw base (a.k.a. E26) general service lamps (a summary of requirements and exemptions is here). Those minimum standards were phased in by wattage and now cover GSLs from 40 to 100W. Decorative and other specialty lamps are excluded. A public meeting and webcast was held on January 20^th to explain the new standards for consumer lamps. You can download a PDF of the presentation here. It’s a long presentation of 94 slides, so here’s a summary.

1. The DOE is considering establishing standards for the following lamp types:

Integrated, non-reflector, medium screw base lamps with a lumen output between 310 and 2,600 lumens
GU24 base, non-reflector lamps with a lumen output between 310 and 2,600 lumens
Non-integrated, non-reflector, pin base, CFLs with a lumen output between 310 and 2,600 lumens

2. The DOE is considering requiring the following lamps, which are currently exempted from EISA requirements, to comply with the new standards:

Left-handed thread
Marine
Reflector
Rough service
Shatter-resistant
3-way
Vibration service
Specific lamp shapes

3. The DOE is also considering not setting standards for certain lamp types for reasons that include:

Low potential for energy savings
Technological infeasibility
Restrictions from the Appropriations Rider

There are over three dozen identified issues that are open for comment. These standards will have a far reaching effect, so I urge you to look over the presentation and submit comments.

Tags: energy efficiency, Federal Government
Comments Off on DOE Extends Comment Period for General Service Lamps Standards

Designing Light

Welcome!

Evaluation Copies

Buy The Book

You are browsing the Blog for Codes.